top of page

Telehealth billing myths that won't die

Telehealth billing is still one of the most misunderstood areas in general practice.


And the same myths keep coming up — even in well-run clinics.


Let's clear a few up.


MYTH 1: YOU CAN'T SPLIT BILL TELEHEALTH ITEMS


This isn't true.


You can bill:


• A general attendance

• And a sexual health/reproductive health (SHR/BBV) item


…as long as:

✔ Both services are clinically relevant

✔ Both meet their criteria

✔ Both are clearly documented


The issue isn't the combination — it's whether the work was actually done.


MYTH 2: YOU CAN'T DO CARE PLANS VIA TELEHEALTH


Also not true.


Care plans can absolutely be done via telehealth if all requirements are met:


• Comprehensive assessment

• Patient input and agreement

• Clear goals and management plan


The challenge is: → It's often harder to do properly


WHERE THE REAL RISK IS


Telehealth becomes risky when:


• There's no established clinical relationship

• Documentation is weak

• Services are rushed or templated poorly


WHAT GOOD LOOKS LIKE


Strong telehealth billing looks exactly like good face-to-face billing:

✔ Clear clinical reasoning

✔ Proper documentation

✔ Services that genuinely occurred


WHERE BETTERBILLING FITS


We don't just tell you what's "allowed" — we show you:


• How to do this properly in real consults

• What documentation actually needs to include

• How to reduce audit risk


Because telehealth isn't the problem. Poor understanding of it is.


 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
The 10997 Change That Most Practices Have Missed

One of the most practical changes to MBS item 10997 isn't about who can receive the service or how many can be claimed. It's about supervision. The MBS now clearly states that the supervising medical

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page